Zitat:
Zitat von adham
...
But we must give enough time to see the effects. We had mush stronger opposition to the 40mm ball and the 11 points games, but today there is general agreement that these were good changes.
...
|
Are you really serious?
If this indeed were good changes, than it would be easy for you to tell us what the outcome of these "good changes" was.
Well, that the industry sold many new balls, because everyone needed new ones doesn't count.
In order to be able to tell that these changes were good, you need to have a compare. Something like: Half of the world played after the new rules, the other half with the old rules. The half with the new rules had a significant raise in member-ship countet against the other half.
To make rules and wait for some years until no one really can remember the time before the changes and than state, that the changes were good is easy. Because no one can proove that you are wrong. On the other hand, can you bring proove that the changes really were good?