Zitat:
Zitat von HSV
https://www.t-online.de/tv/news/coro...deszahlen.html
Es gibt in der Deutung der Zahlen vielleicht ein Tabu, an das sich viele/alle halten:
Die Aussage, dass jeder Mensch nur 1 x sterben kann. Denn wer früher stirbt, ist länger tot.
Es kann doch nicht sein, dass bspw. Schweden lobend erwähnt wird, dass dort bezügl. der aktuellen Entwicklung die Sterbezahl rückläufig ist.
Für mich ist das absolut logisch. Aufgrund des Vorgenannten. Denn nicht jeder ist James Bond, der (nur) zweimal lebt.
|
Es liegt auch nicht an den sinnlosen Lockdowns... Eine weitere, aktuelle Studie bestätigt das erneut:
Stay-at-home policy is a case of exception fallacy: an internet-based ecological study, Savaris et al., 2021,
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-84092-1
"We were not able to explain the variation of deaths/million in different regions in the world by social isolation, herein analyzed as differences in staying at home, compared to baseline. In the restrictive and global comparisons, only 3% and 1.6% of the comparisons were significantly different, respectively. These findings are in accordance with those found by Klein et al. These authors explain why lockdown was the least probable cause for Sweden's high death rate from COVID-19. Likewise, Chaudry et al. made a country-level exploratory analysis, using a variety of socioeconomic and health-related characteristics, similar to what we have done here, and reported that full lockdowns and wide-spread testing were not associated with COVID-19 mortality per million people...
In conclusion, using this methodology and current data, in ~ 98% of the comparisons using 87 different regions of the world we found no evidence that the number of deaths/million is reduced by staying at home. Regional differences in treatment methods and the natural course of the virus may also be major factors in this pandemic, and further studies are necessary to better understand it."