Zitat:
Zitat von Schrottkopf
|
Davor wurden mit Phantasie-Studien begründet, warum man minderjährigen Kindern Pubertätsblockern gibt oder diese zu Operationen gedrängt werden. Die "echte Studie" dazu wurde unter den Tisch gekehrt:
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/23/s...n-kennedy.html
The leader of the long-running study said that the drugs did not improve mental health in children with gender distress and that the finding might be weaponized by opponents of the care.
The doctor, Johanna Olson-Kennedy, began the study in 2015 as part of a broader, multimillion-dollar federal project on transgender youth. But the American trial did not find a similar trend, Dr. Olson-Kennedy said in a wide-ranging interview. Puberty blockers did not lead to mental health improvements, she said, most likely because the children were already doing well when the study began.
In the nine years since the study was funded by the National Institutes of Health, and as medical care for this small group of adolescents became a searing issue in American politics,
Dr. Olson-Kennedy*s team has not published the data. Asked why, she said the findings might fuel the kind of political attacks that have led to bans of the youth gender treatments in more than 20 states, one of which will soon be considered by the Supreme Court.
*I do not want our work to be weaponized,* she said. *It has to be exactly on point, clear and concise. And that takes time.*
Die Linke sagt doch immer "Follow the Science"
