Zitat:
Zitat von adham
I do not know. If these rubbers pass the ITTF tests then they will continue to enjoy the ITTF authorization, if they do not pass the ITTF tests then they will not be on the next authorization list. But I have no information that the rubbers you mentioned have been banned. In fact, the ITTF does not "ban" any rubbers/ What we have is a request from a rubber manufacturer to use the ITTF logo on their product. So, the ITTF first tests the samples given by the manufacturer. If they meet ITTF criteria and rules, then the ITTF "authorizes" the manufacturer to use the ITTF logo on the rubber. later, randomly, the ITTF will test the same rubber taken from the retail market to make sure that it also meets the ITTF requirements. If it passes the test, no problem. If it des not pass the test we advise the manufacturer and try to find out the problem so that it can be corrected. If we still can not fix the problem then the rubber does not receive the authorization to use the ITTF logo and it does not appear on the next list of authorized rubber coverings. The manufacturer can continue to produce the rubber and sell it, but without the ITTF logo. Nothing is banned. It is just a question of authorization to use the ITTF logo, which belongs to the ITTF just like the Olympic rings belong to the IOC.
|
I dont understand something. If ITTF gets only the rubber for homologization how are you able to check a covering bought from the retail market? The 90%of the coverings are assembled. Mainly the popular ones eg. Tenergy 05.
In the other hand. What do you think how long will the manufacturers spend millions for developing if ITTF found new and new criteria month by month that makes the development in vain?